Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Sempron SI-40 is newer than Intel Celeron M 520 @ 1.60GHz also around 17% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 20% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Celeron M 520 @ 1.60GHz uses around 18% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 101 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Celeron M 520 @ 1.60GHz | |
2: AMD Sempron SI-40 | |
×Intel Celeron M 520 @ 1.60GHz | ×AMD Sempron SI-40 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | Search Online | |
Socket Type | PPGA478 | S1 | |
CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
Clockspeed | 1.6 GHz | 2.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 1 (Threads: 1) | 1 (Threads: 1) | |
Cache | L1: 64KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, | |
TDP | 30W | 25W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $5.48 | $4.56 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2008 | Q1 2009 | |
# of Samples | 68 | 33 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 24.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 5053(-19.9%) | 6313(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 239(-17.0%) | 288(0.0%) |
Intel Celeron M 520 @ 1.60GHz | 239 | |
AMD Sempron SI-40 | 288 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron M 520 @ 1.60GHz | NA | |
AMD Sempron SI-40 | 24.0 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron M 520 @ 1.60GHz | 505 | |
AMD Sempron SI-40 | 631 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron M 520 @ 1.60GHz | AMD Sempron SI-40 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 30W | 25W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.06 | 0.05 |
Running cost per day | $0.015 | $0.013 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 21.9 | 18.3 |
Running cost per year | $5.47 | $4.56 |