Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H @ 2.50GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 9174F and is around -47% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H @ 2.50GHz is around -33% slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon Gold 5318H @ 2.50GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 4 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Gold 5318H @ 2.50GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 9174F | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 5318H @ 2.50GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9174F | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4189 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 4.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.8 GHz | Up to 4.4 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 18 (Threads: 36) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 1,152KB, L2: 18.0MB, L3: 25MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 150W | 320W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $27.38 | $58.40 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2024 | Q2 2023 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 2 | |
CPU Value | 23.0 | 24.4 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2225(-33.0%) | 3318(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 29301(-47.2%) | 55485(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 5318H @ 2.50GHz | 29,301 | |
AMD EPYC 9174F | 55,485 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5318H @ 2.50GHz | 23.0 | |
AMD EPYC 9174F | 24.4 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5318H @ 2.50GHz | 2,225 | |
AMD EPYC 9174F | 3,318 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5318H @ 2.50GHz | AMD EPYC 9174F | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 150W | 320W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.30 | 0.64 |
Running cost per day | $0.075 | $0.160 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 109.5 | 233.6 |
Running cost per year | $27.38 | $58.40 |