Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Turion II Neo K625 Dual-Core is newer than AMD Athlon II P320 Dual-Core and is around -11% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The AMD Turion II Neo K625 Dual-Core is around -22% slower in single-thread testing. Also, AMD Athlon II P320 Dual-Core uses around 50% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 595 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD Turion II Neo K625 Dual-Core | |
2: AMD Athlon II P320 Dual-Core | |
×AMD Turion II Neo K625 Dual-Core | ×AMD Athlon II P320 Dual-Core | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$19.95 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | S1 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
Clockspeed | 1.5 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 2.0MB, | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, | |
TDP | 15W | 25W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $2.74 | $4.56 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2010 | Q2 2010 | |
# of Samples | 16 | 579 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 34.8 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 6313(-22.2%) | 8113(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 618(-11.1%) | 695(0.0%) |
AMD Turion II Neo K625 Dual-Core | 618 | |
AMD Athlon II P320 Dual-Core | 695 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Turion II Neo K625 Dual-Core | NA | |
AMD Athlon II P320 Dual-Core | 34.8 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Turion II Neo K625 Dual-Core | 631 | |
AMD Athlon II P320 Dual-Core | 811 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Turion II Neo K625 Dual-Core | AMD Athlon II P320 Dual-Core | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 15W | 25W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.03 | 0.05 |
Running cost per day | $0.007 | $0.013 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 10.9 | 18.3 |
Running cost per year | $2.74 | $4.56 |