Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7F52 and is around -40% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz is around -11% slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 22 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 7F52 | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7F52 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$790.41 - BUY
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.0 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 20 (Threads: 40) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 1,280KB, L2: 20.0MB, L3: 28MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 125W | 240W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $22.81 | $43.80 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2021 | Q2 2020 | |
# of Samples | 7 | 15 | |
CPU Value | 31.3 | 21.8 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2234(-10.9%) | 2507(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 24742(-40.1%) | 41322(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz | 24,742 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 41,322 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz | 31.3 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 21.8 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz | 2,234 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 2,507 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz | AMD EPYC 7F52 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 125W | 240W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.25 | 0.48 |
Running cost per day | $0.063 | $0.120 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 91.3 | 175.2 |
Running cost per year | $22.81 | $43.80 |