Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4 @ 2.20GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7F52, while AMD EPYC 7F52 is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 30% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4 @ 2.20GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 16 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4 @ 2.20GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 7F52 | |
×Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4 @ 2.20GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7F52 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | Search Online | |
Socket Type | FCLGA2011-3 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.9 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 18 (Threads: 36) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 32MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 135W | 240W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $24.64 | $43.80 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2021 | Q2 2020 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 15 | |
CPU Value | 3.5 | 24.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1757(-29.9%) | 2507(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 20319(-50.8%) | 41322(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4 @ 2.20GHz | 20,319 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 41,322 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4 @ 2.20GHz | 3.5 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 24.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4 @ 2.20GHz | 1,757 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 2,507 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4 @ 2.20GHz | AMD EPYC 7F52 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 135W | 240W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.27 | 0.48 |
Running cost per day | $0.068 | $0.120 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 98.6 | 175.2 |
Running cost per year | $24.64 | $43.80 |