Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9254 is newer than Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.30GHz also around 48% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 24% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 9254 uses around 19% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 14 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.30GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9254 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | $2440.45 - BUY | |
Socket Type | LGA3647 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 4.2 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 32MB | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 24.0MB, L3: 128MB | |
TDP | 165W | 200W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $30.11 | $36.50 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2020 | Q2 2023 | |
# of Samples | 3 | 11 | |
CPU Value | 4.4 | 26.6 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2315(-23.7%) | 3036(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 33970(-47.6%) | 64815(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.30GHz | 33,970 | |
AMD EPYC 9254 | 64,815 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.30GHz | 4.4 | |
AMD EPYC 9254 | 26.6 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.30GHz | 2,315 | |
AMD EPYC 9254 | 3,036 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.30GHz | AMD EPYC 9254 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 165W | 200W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |