Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz is newer than Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz also around 10% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 14% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1499 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
×Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz | ×Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$208.99 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA1200 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 1.9 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.6 GHz | Up to 4.8 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 10 (Threads: 20) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 2.5MB, L3: 20MB | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 16MB | |
TDP | 35W | 65W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $11.86 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2020 | Q3 2020 | |
# of Samples | 36 | 1463 | |
CPU Value | 42.4 | 78.6 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2469(-14.3%) | 2879(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 14822(-9.8%) | 16428(0.0%) |
Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz | 14,822 | |
Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | 16,428 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz | 42.4 | |
Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | 78.6 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz | 2,469 | |
Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | 2,879 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz | Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 35W | 65W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |