Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7302P is newer than Intel Xeon W-3265 @ 2.70GHz and is around 9% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The AMD EPYC 7302P is around -26% slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon W-3265 @ 2.70GHz uses around 28% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 39 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon W-3265 @ 2.70GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 7302P | |
×Intel Xeon W-3265 @ 2.70GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7302P | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$457.65 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.7 GHz | 3.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.4 GHz | Up to 3.3 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 32MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 128MB | |
TDP | 205W | 155W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $37.41 | $28.29 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2019 | Q4 2019 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 37 | |
CPU Value | 6.6 | 71.4 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2572(0.0%) | 1893(-26.4%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 30105(-7.9%) | 32690(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon W-3265 @ 2.70GHz | 30,105 | |
AMD EPYC 7302P | 32,690 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon W-3265 @ 2.70GHz | 6.6 | |
AMD EPYC 7302P | 71.4 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon W-3265 @ 2.70GHz | 2,572 | |
AMD EPYC 7302P | 1,893 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon W-3265 @ 2.70GHz | AMD EPYC 7302P | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 205W | 155W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.41 | 0.31 |
Running cost per day | $0.102 | $0.077 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 149.6 | 113.2 |
Running cost per year | $37.41 | $28.29 |