Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9174F is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6254 @ 3.10GHz also around 43% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 29% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 9174F uses around 46% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 7 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 6254 @ 3.10GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9174F | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $1498.95 - BUY | Search Online | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.1 GHz | 4.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.0 GHz | Up to 4.4 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 18 (Threads: 36) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 25MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 200W | 320W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $36.50 | $58.40 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2019 | Q2 2023 | |
# of Samples | 5 | 2 | |
CPU Value | 21.0 | 24.4 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2363(-28.8%) | 3318(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 31513(-43.2%) | 55485(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 6254 @ 3.10GHz | 31,513 | |
AMD EPYC 9174F | 55,485 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6254 @ 3.10GHz | 21.0 | |
AMD EPYC 9174F | 24.4 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6254 @ 3.10GHz | 2,363 | |
AMD EPYC 9174F | 3,318 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6254 @ 3.10GHz | AMD EPYC 9174F | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 200W | 320W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |