Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9224 is newer than Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz also around 32% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing but the CPUs have comparable single-thread rating. However, AMD EPYC 9224 uses around 29% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 7 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9224 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $1179.91 - BUY | Search Online | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.7 GHz | Up to 3.7 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 24.0MB, L3: 33MB | L1: 3,072KB, L2: 48.0MB, L3: 128MB | |
TDP | 150W | 200W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $27.38 | $36.50 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2017 | Q2 2023 | |
# of Samples | 4 | 3 | |
CPU Value | 24.4 | 21.8 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2077(0.0%) | 2057(-1.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 28825(-32.1%) | 42448(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | 28,825 | |
AMD EPYC 9224 | 42,448 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | 24.4 | |
AMD EPYC 9224 | 21.8 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | 2,077 | |
AMD EPYC 9224 | 2,057 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | AMD EPYC 9224 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 150W | 200W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |