Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 73F3 is newer than Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz also around 37% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 28% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 73F3 uses around 46% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 24 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | ×AMD EPYC 73F3 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $1179.91 - BUY | $2203.1 - BUY | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.7 GHz | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 24.0MB, L3: 33MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 150W | 240W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $27.38 | $43.80 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2017 | Q2 2021 | |
# of Samples | 4 | 20 | |
CPU Value | 24.4 | 20.9 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2077(-27.9%) | 2883(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 28825(-37.5%) | 46103(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | 28,825 | |
AMD EPYC 73F3 | 46,103 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | 24.4 | |
AMD EPYC 73F3 | 20.9 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | 2,077 | |
AMD EPYC 73F3 | 2,883 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | AMD EPYC 73F3 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 150W | 240W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |