Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron 2000E @ 2.20GHz is newer than AMD A9-9400 also around 17% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 6% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD A9-9400 uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 72 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD A9-9400 | |
2: Intel Celeron 2000E @ 2.20GHz | |
×AMD A9-9400 | ×Intel Celeron 2000E @ 2.20GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FP4 | FCBGA1364 | |
CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.2 GHz | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (in 2 physical modules) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 2.0MB, | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 2MB | |
TDP | 10W | 37W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $1.83 | $6.75 | |
Other | RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G | Intel HD Graphics | |
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | |
# of Samples | 71 | 1 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1199(-6.4%) | 1282(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1332(-17.1%) | 1607(0.0%) |
AMD A9-9400 | 1,332 | |
Intel Celeron 2000E @ 2.20GHz | 1,607 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD A9-9400 | 1,199 | |
Intel Celeron 2000E @ 2.20GHz | 1,282 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD A9-9400 | Intel Celeron 2000E @ 2.20GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 10W | 37W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.02 | 0.07 |
Running cost per day | $0.005 | $0.018 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 7.3 | 27.0 |
Running cost per year | $1.82 | $6.75 |