Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD PRO A10-9700E is newer than Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz also around 22% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 15% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD PRO A10-9700E uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 4152 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×AMD PRO A10-9700E | ×Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | AM4 | LGA775 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.0 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.5 GHz | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (in 2 physical modules) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 4.0MB, | L1: 256KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | 35W | 95W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $17.34 | |
Other | R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2016 | Q4 2008 | |
# of Samples | 69 | 4083 | |
CPU Value | 21.8 | 14.6 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1438(0.0%) | 1216(-15.4%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 3027(0.0%) | 2351(-22.3%) |
AMD PRO A10-9700E | 3,027 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz | 2,351 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD PRO A10-9700E | 21.8 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz | 14.6 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD PRO A10-9700E | 1,438 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz | 1,216 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD PRO A10-9700E | Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 35W | 95W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |