Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD GX-210JA SOC is newer than Intel Celeron 3205U @ 1.50GHz however is significantly slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. However, it is significantly slower in single-thread testing. Also, AMD GX-210JA SOC uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 138 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD GX-210JA SOC | |
2: Intel Celeron 3205U @ 1.50GHz | |
×AMD GX-210JA SOC | ×Intel Celeron 3205U @ 1.50GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FT3 (769-BGA) | FCBGA1168 | |
CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
Clockspeed | 1.0 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | NA2 | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 2.0MB, | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 2MB | |
TDP | 6W | 15W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $1.10 | $2.74 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2015 | Q2 2015 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 137 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 3.3 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 231(-74.6%) | 908(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 248(-74.1%) | 956(0.0%) |
AMD GX-210JA SOC | 248 | |
Intel Celeron 3205U @ 1.50GHz | 956 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD GX-210JA SOC | NA | |
Intel Celeron 3205U @ 1.50GHz | 3.3 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD GX-210JA SOC | 231 | |
Intel Celeron 3205U @ 1.50GHz | 908 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD GX-210JA SOC | Intel Celeron 3205U @ 1.50GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 6W | 15W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | 0.03 |
Running cost per day | NA | $0.007 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | 10.9 |
Running cost per year | NA | $2.74 |