Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7451 is newer than Intel Xeon E5-4627 v2 @ 3.30GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 9% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 7451 uses around 32% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 15 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon E5-4627 v2 @ 3.30GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 7451 | |
×Intel Xeon E5-4627 v2 @ 3.30GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7451 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | Search Online | |
Socket Type | FCLGA2011 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.3 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.6 GHz | Up to 3.2 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 8) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 16MB | L1: 2,304KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 64MB | |
TDP | 130W | 180W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $23.73 | $32.85 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2015 | Q1 2018 | |
# of Samples | 9 | 6 | |
CPU Value | 18.7 | 14.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1786(-8.6%) | 1955(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 9320(-64.0%) | 25863(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon E5-4627 v2 @ 3.30GHz | 9,320 | |
AMD EPYC 7451 | 25,863 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-4627 v2 @ 3.30GHz | 18.7 | |
AMD EPYC 7451 | 14.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-4627 v2 @ 3.30GHz | 1,786 | |
AMD EPYC 7451 | 1,955 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-4627 v2 @ 3.30GHz | AMD EPYC 7451 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 130W | 180W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.26 | 0.36 |
Running cost per day | $0.065 | $0.090 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 94.9 | 131.4 |
Running cost per year | $23.73 | $32.85 |