Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 @ 2.80GHz is newer than AMD Opteron 3365 also around 7% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 30% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD Opteron 3365 uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 171 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 @ 2.80GHz | ×AMD Opteron 3365 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | Search Online | |
Socket Type | LGA2011-v3 | AM3+ | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.8 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 3.3 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 4) | 8 (in 4 physical modules) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 10MB | L1: 640KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 8MB | |
TDP | 140W | 65W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $25.55 | $11.86 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2015 | Q4 2014 | |
# of Samples | 140 | 31 | |
CPU Value | 344.1 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1616(0.0%) | 1132(-29.9%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 4432(0.0%) | 4105(-7.4%) |
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 @ 2.80GHz | 4,432 | |
AMD Opteron 3365 | 4,105 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 @ 2.80GHz | 344.1 | |
AMD Opteron 3365 | NA | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 @ 2.80GHz | 1,616 | |
AMD Opteron 3365 | 1,132 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 @ 2.80GHz | AMD Opteron 3365 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 140W | 65W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |