Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i5-10400 @ 2.90GHz is newer than Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz also around 19% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 22% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core i5-10400 @ 2.90GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 8717 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz | |
2: Intel Core i5-10400 @ 2.90GHz | |
×Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz | ×Intel Core i5-10400 @ 2.90GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | LGA2011-v3 | FCLGA1200 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.6 GHz | Up to 4.3 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 6 (Threads: 12) | 6 (Threads: 12) | |
Cache | L1: 384KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 15MB | L1: 384KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 12MB | |
TDP | 140W | 65W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $25.55 | $11.86 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2014 | Q2 2020 | |
# of Samples | 4964 | 3753 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1990(-22.4%) | 2565(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 9828(-18.5%) | 12061(0.0%) |
Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz | 9,828 | |
Intel Core i5-10400 @ 2.90GHz | 12,061 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz | 1,990 | |
Intel Core i5-10400 @ 2.90GHz | 2,565 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz | Intel Core i5-10400 @ 2.90GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 140W | 65W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.28 | 0.13 |
Running cost per day | $0.070 | $0.033 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 102.2 | 47.5 |
Running cost per year | $25.55 | $11.86 |