Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon L5639 @ 2.13GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz and is around -29% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon L5639 @ 2.13GHz is around -15% slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz uses around 29% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 251 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon L5639 @ 2.13GHz | |
2: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz | |
×Intel Xeon L5639 @ 2.13GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$98.95 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | LGA1366 | FCLGA2011 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.7 GHz | Up to 2.6 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 6 (Threads: 12) | 6 (Threads: 12) | |
Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, | L1: 384KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 15MB | |
TDP | 60W | 80W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $10.95 | $14.60 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2013 | Q3 2013 | |
# of Samples | 16 | 235 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 63.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1102(-14.6%) | 1291(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 4419(-29.3%) | 6250(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon L5639 @ 2.13GHz | 4,419 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz | 6,250 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon L5639 @ 2.13GHz | NA | |
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz | 63.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon L5639 @ 2.13GHz | 1,102 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz | 1,291 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon L5639 @ 2.13GHz | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 60W | 80W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.12 | 0.16 |
Running cost per day | $0.030 | $0.040 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 43.8 | 58.4 |
Running cost per year | $10.95 | $14.60 |