Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The VIA Nano L2100@1800MHz is newer than Intel Celeron 550 @ 2.00GHz, while Intel Celeron 550 @ 2.00GHz is around 17% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing and is significantly faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Celeron 550 @ 2.00GHz uses around 21% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 95 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: VIA Nano L2100@1800MHz | |
2: Intel Celeron 550 @ 2.00GHz | |
×VIA Nano L2100@1800MHz | ×Intel Celeron 550 @ 2.00GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | BGA400 | BGA479 | |
CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
Clockspeed | 1.8 GHz | 2.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 1 (Threads: 1) | 1 (Threads: 1) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 1.0MB, | L1: 64KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | 25W | 31W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $4.56 | $5.66 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2011 | Q1 2009 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 93 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 6.1 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 182(-72.6%) | 6623(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 279(-16.6%) | 334(0.0%) |
VIA Nano L2100@1800MHz | 279 | |
Intel Celeron 550 @ 2.00GHz | 334 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
VIA Nano L2100@1800MHz | NA | |
Intel Celeron 550 @ 2.00GHz | 6.1 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
VIA Nano L2100@1800MHz | 182 | |
Intel Celeron 550 @ 2.00GHz | 662 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
VIA Nano L2100@1800MHz | Intel Celeron 550 @ 2.00GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 25W | 31W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.05 | 0.06 |
Running cost per day | $0.013 | $0.015 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 18.3 | 22.6 |
Running cost per year | $4.56 | $5.66 |