Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-2658 @ 2.10GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz is around 34% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz uses around 31% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1620 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon E5-2658 @ 2.10GHz | |
2: Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz | |
×Intel Xeon E5-2658 @ 2.10GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $22.95 - BUY | $70 - BUY | |
Socket Type | LGA2011 | LGA2011 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.4 GHz | Up to 3.8 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 4 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 20MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 10MB | |
TDP | 95W | 130W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $17.34 | $23.73 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2012 | Q2 2012 | |
# of Samples | 7 | 1613 | |
CPU Value | 264.6 | 83.6 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1156(-34.3%) | 1760(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 6073(0.0%) | 5854(-3.6%) |
Intel Xeon E5-2658 @ 2.10GHz | 6,073 | |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz | 5,854 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2658 @ 2.10GHz | 264.6 | |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz | 83.6 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2658 @ 2.10GHz | 1,156 | |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz | 1,760 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2658 @ 2.10GHz | Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 95W | 130W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.19 | 0.26 |
Running cost per day | $0.048 | $0.065 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 69.3 | 94.9 |
Running cost per year | $17.34 | $23.73 |