Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 3251 is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.20GHz also around 41% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 26% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 3251 uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 216 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.20GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 3251 | |
×Intel Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.20GHz | ×AMD EPYC 3251 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $19 - BUY | Search Online | |
Socket Type | LGA2011 | SP4r2 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.0 GHz | Up to 3.1 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 20MB | L1: 2,048KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 95W | 50W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $17.34 | $9.13 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2012 | Q4 2019 | |
# of Samples | 200 | 16 | |
CPU Value | 429.5 | 44.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1394(-25.9%) | 1881(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 8161(-41.3%) | 13912(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.20GHz | 8,161 | |
AMD EPYC 3251 | 13,912 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.20GHz | 429.5 | |
AMD EPYC 3251 | 44.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.20GHz | 1,394 | |
AMD EPYC 3251 | 1,881 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.20GHz | AMD EPYC 3251 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 95W | 50W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.19 | 0.10 |
Running cost per day | $0.048 | $0.025 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 69.3 | 36.5 |
Running cost per year | $17.34 | $9.13 |